Massachusetts Criminal Defense Attorney

225 W. Squantum St., Suite 100, Quincy, MA 02171

Free Consultations Available


Attorney Sabrina Bonanno Defends Man Accused of Tracking Boston Couple’s Car

The Supreme Judicial Court has decided to weigh in on a case where a man has been accused of tracking two vehicles using a GPS device. The Commonwealth alleged in court documents that the man believed his significant other was having an affair and that is why he used the GPS devices.

After being charged with criminal harassment, the man’s attorney, Sabrina Bonanno (of Sweeney & Associates LLC) successfully argued in District Court that the charges should be dismissed. The Commonwealth appealed the dismissal and the Supreme Judicial Court has decide to weigh in on the issue of whether it is legal to track the whereabouts of another person using a GPS device in Massachusetts.

“My client is accused of doing what any private investigator would have done,” said Bonanno, the Quincy attorney representing the man. “It is not a violation of the law.” Bonanno defends against the suggestion that the actions, though admittedly disconcerting for the affected parties, are criminal under Massachusetts law.

The Supreme Judicial Court is likely to schedule oral argument for the fall of 2018 and will ultimately render a decision that could change how GPS tracking devices are used in Massachusetts by private citizens.

Woman Sentenced for Theft of More Than $.25 Million in Government Benefits

A Dorchester woman, represented by Attorney Richard Sweeney of Sweeney and Associates in Massachusetts, was sentenced to home confinement rather than 18-24 months imprisonment, which the sentencing guidelines recommended, after convicted of stealing more than a quarter-million dollars in government benefits to which she was not entitled.

The woman was sentenced by U.S. District Court Chief Judge Patti B. Saris to 18 months of home confinement, 10 hours per week of community service, and was ordered to pay $331,630 in restitution and a fine of $40,000. In July 2014, she pleaded guilty to stealing public money in the form of Social Security and Civil Service Retirement annuity payments paid out for the benefit of her mother.

Following the death of her mother, the woman was not herself entitled to the money yet continued to receive and spend the benefits for over 30 years. It was alleged she stole over $200,000 in Social Security benefits and $140,000 in Civil Service Retirement System annuity payments intended for her mother. Upon discovering the theft, the government reclaimed a portion of the funds from her bank account and she repaid the balance, $331,630, at her sentencing today.

This case was brought as part of an ongoing effort by the U.S. Attorney's Office in partnership with the Social Security Administration to investigate and prosecute the posthumous fraud of Social Security benefits. In many of these cases, family members, knowing they are not entitled to government benefits, continue to withdraw and spend the funds after a relative has died. This ongoing investigation has landed several defendants in federal prison for these crimes.

Man Sentenced to 5 Years' Probation for 2 Counts of Possession of Child Porn

A Weymouth man was sentenced to five years' probation in Norfolk Superior Court for two counts of Possession of Child Porn. The Weymouth native, represented by Attorney Richard Sweeney of Sweeney and Associates, pled guilty and was ordered to register with the Sex Offender Registry Board, wear an ankle monitor and serve five years of supervised probation. The District Attorney's Office had asked for up to five years imprisonment.

Motion to Suppress Allowed in Drug Case Alleging Sale Witnessed by Police

A Braintree man, represented by Attorney Richard Sweeney of Sweeney and Associates, was alleged to have purchased drugs from a home in Braintree. A Braintree detective witnessed what he testified to as a hand-to-hand sale of narcotics. The vehicle was stopped and drugs and money were recovered from the vehicle. The man was indicted on the drug charges and arraigned in Superior Court. After a full hearing in Norfolk Superior Court on the defendant's Motion To Suppress the search of the vehicle, the court ruled that the officer lacked probable cause to search the vehicle and the evidence was suppressed. As a direct result, the case was dismissed against the Braintree man for lack of evidence.

Recent News:

Case Results:

Contact Sweeney & Associates, LLC

We Solve Problems

  • Please enter your name.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please select an option.
  • Please enter a message.
  • I have read the
    disclaimer. Privacy Policy
    The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.
    Please check that you have read the disclaimer.